The Moon, long thought to be a geologically dormant world, is now revealing exciting new secrets about its dynamic past and present. Recently, scientists have discovered previously unobserved ridges on the lunar surface. This has led to providing compelling evidence that the Moon continues to experience significant geological activity even today. These newly identified moon geology features, formed by the buckling and thrust faulting of the lunar crust, offer a tantalizing glimpse into the Moon’s ongoing internal processes. By studying the characteristics and distribution of these ridges, researchers hope to shed light on the thermal and tectonic evolution of Earth’s nearest neighbor. As the mysteries of the Moon’s geology continue to unfold, these findings are poised to rewrite our understanding of the Moon’s complex and ever-changing history.
New Discoveries of Ridged Terrain on the Moon
Scientists have focused on the moon and the moon’s geology for many years to unveil its geological history. Recent research, however, suggests that there is much more to learn about the moon’s surface. A team from the Smithsonian Institution and the University of Maryland has found evidence that parts of the moon might still be active today. Their study, published in The Planetary Science Journal, highlights significant new findings.
Understanding Lunar Ridges in the Moon’s Geology
The researchers discovered 266 previously unknown small ridges on the moon’s far side. Interestingly, these ridges are significantly younger than those found on the near side. This finding leads scientists to rethink our understanding of lunar development and the moon’s geology over time. According to Jaclyn Clark, a key researcher, “Many scientists believe that most geological movements occurred billions of years ago; however, we see evidence of activity in the last billion years.” This means that there might be ongoing geological processes. Thus, our perceptions of lunar history may need revision.
The Formation Process in Moon’s Geology
Using a technique in studying the moon’s geology, known as crater counting, researchers estimated the age of these ridges. They found that regions with fewer craters were younger than those with more craters. Clark notes, “After counting craters around these small ridges and observing how some cut through existing impact craters, we concluded they were tectonically active within 160 million years.” This analysis is crucial because it helps us understand which forces are shaping these features.
Implications for Future Moon Missions
This new understanding of lunar geology could affect future plans for expeditions to the moon. Knowing that parts of the moon remain active could help scientists determine safer locations for crews and equipment. For instance, as Clark states optimistically, “We hope future missions include tools like ground-penetrating radar to explore beneath the surface.” Such advancements would improve our understanding and safety strategies when exploring lunar terrain.
The Similarities Between Ridges
Another interesting point in this new understanding of the moon’s geology is that these newer ridges share structural similarities with older ones found on the near side of the moon. This suggests a common geological process behind their formation—likely due to tectonic shifts and shrinkage of the moon’s surface over time.
As studies continue to unfold, we gain more insight into our neighboring celestial body—the moon—, it’s geology and its intriguing behavior through billions of years. Understanding such dynamics not only satisfies scientific curiosity but also lays groundwork for possible human colonization in future missions.
Additionally, to stay updated with the latest developments in STEM research, visit ENTECH Online. Basically, this is our digital magazine for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Furthermore, at ENTECH Online, you’ll find a wealth of information.
Reference
C. A. Nypaver, T. R. Watters, J. D. Clark. Recent Tectonic Deformation of the Lunar Farside Mare and South Pole–Aitken Basin. The Planetary Science Journal, 2025; 6 (1): 16 DOI: 10.3847/PSJ/ad9eaa
